When the play in question is called Stripper Lesbians, one might assume that there will be strippers who are also lesbians. An astute reader is also likely to surmise that the subtext is going to center on labels. Neither assumption is incorrect when applied to the play Stripper Lesbians, directed by Jeff Woodbridge, currently running as part of the Frigid Festival in New York City. It is about strippers who are lesbians and the major dramatic (or possibly comedic) arc makes great swooping circles around the issue with labeling.
The center of this play, written by Kate Foster, teeters uneasily on a love triangle—at its vertex sits the androgynously named Evan (Amanda Berry). Her ex-boyfriend DJ (Joe Beaudin) and her current girlfriend Aisha (Samantha Cooper) serve as the two base angles. Because this play is also about labels, these three characters are also “the academic,” “the heterosexual male,” and the “stripper-lesbian.” There is, therefore, some truth in advertising.
Evan’s writing a thesis (presumably in women’s studies, indistinctly a senior or masters thesis) on strippers. At the behest of the symbolically named DJ, then her boyfriend, Evan takes a job at Wildlands, the local strip club. There she meets Aisha, whom she first studies for her thesis and with whom she later gets Sapphic. It’s the old “Girl-Meets-Girl,” “Girl-Dumps-Boy,” “Girls-Dance-For-Cash-Using-Vaguely-Pina-Baush-Inspired-Choreography-In-The-Most-Improbable-Strip-Club-Ever-Brought-To-The-Stage” story. You know how it goes.
Ok, here’s the deal. I feel bad about trashing this production. It’s clear that the three-member cast is working hard and earnestly, and I feel compelled to acknowledge that it’s good to support any small-budget theatre festival. From somewhere must spring the plays, actors and playwrights who will feed American theatre and nourish American theatregoers, and, really, it does little good for me, a writer who is not even a theatre critic, to bash their collective adorable little brains and their good intentions with the hard rock of my prose. I wish all who had a hand in this blighted production the very best in their professional and personal lives, but speaking as a woman who spent several years as a stripper (and a brief fraction of her life as a lesbian, though those two periods didn’t overlap), I have to admit that this play was pretty awful.
In part, I had a hard time figuring out whether Stripper Lesbians was sending up or trying to play realistically the various political conceits and dramatic tropes that it was juggling. These conceits and tropes were, in no particular order, the following: feminists, sex workers, feminist sex workers, heterosexual males, lesbians, the heterosexual male obsession with lesbians and/or strippers, sex positivity, and really unflattering lingerie.
I also had difficulty following the logic of this play. To wit: Aisha is both a stripper and, as DJ reads from Evan’s thesis, “unemployed.” DJ himself is actually unemployed, although he does audition for Eugene O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey into Night using a monologue taken from Our Bodies, Ourselves, and appears to live with Evan post-breakup under her good graces and on the money that she earns as a stripper, despite the fact that she was a finalist in “Glamour’s College Student of the Year” for her article that “Mak[es] Anti-Sex Trafficking Sexy,” which was taken from the thesis she wrote while working at Wildlands, a strip club that does not appear to dabble in sex trafficking but has attracted the interest of Playboy, which wants Aisha to pose, to which Evan is opposed to because it’s antifeminist, which they discuss in a scene that takes place after one showing on-stage discourse that culls equally from a Gender Studies 101 syllabus and any episode of South Park featuring Cartman’s mom’s scheisse films (suffice to say that Judith Butler, Simone de Beauvoir, spanking and German accents make cameos). Oh, Aisha is also a cellist. She plays not for money but because it’s her “passion.” However, I suspect my greatest antipathy to Stripper Lesbians came not so much from the kind of sense it made—which was none—and more from the fact that it didn’t seem as if anyone connected with this show had ever been inside a strip club, much less talked to an actual stripper. Things that show, in no particular order, that the show’s writer, director, choreographer, costume designer, and possibly actors have never visited a strip club nor talked to an actual stripper:
- The strippers in question never count their singles.
- One stripper says of appearing on the pages of Playboy: “It’ll double my salary.”
- Upon leaving stage, a stripper says, “I can’t believe they let me dance to Joan Jett here!”
- One stripper dances in silver lamé platform wedge sandals.
- Both strippers dance in full bikini panties. Relatedly, also bras. Which appear to come from The Gap.
- Neither stripper wears a garter.
- Neither stripper actually, you know, strips.
- Both strippers in question seem to have private dressing rooms.
- The strippers in question know precisely what time they’ll appear on stage
- One stripper gets angry and breaks, not a mirror, but into interpretive dance.
- There is no talk of tip-outs, house fees, DJs (other than the ex-boyfriend character), custies, bouncers, managers or other strip club ephemera.
- A clear and decisive dearth of dubstep.
There should be a rule: if you’re going to write something about strippers, you should go to a strip club. Barring that, find a friend who knows someone who has worked in a strip club and take her out for coffee. And if you can’t do that, fire up the Google machine and read some blogs.
Strippers are not mythological creatures like unicorns. We exist, and when we see our world depicted in ham-fisted ways, we take it personally. It’s one thing if a work of art, like, for example, Atom Egoyan’s Exotica, creates a three-dimensional parallel universe that is a plausible simulacrum of a strip club without being anything like an actual strip club. It’s another thing entirely if a piece of art involving a strip club exposes its fundamental lack of understanding of a strip club’s basic operation whilst attempting to express a message—and here, without giving away too much of the plot in case you do go—that the art intends as pro-sex worker. I suspect, though I’m not entirely sure, the message is that strippers (and lesbians) are just regular girls like you. And me. But mostly you.
However, when as in Stripper Lesbians there are so very many facets that run full-force-ugly into the wall of actual stripper experience, any message is lost. For example, Aisha reads Evan’s thesis and takes understandable umbrage to Evan’s predatory dissection of her; Aisha gets angry (insert interpretive dance); they fight; their fight crescendos as Evan calls Aisha “a stripper,” spitting the word like an epithet. Herein lies the lesson. Obviously, Evan too is a stripper, and thus through her hypocritical stance, the play calls her superiority into question and implicitly calls her out for slumming it as a stripper and, one supposes, as a lesbian. This message, however, falls flat because the play has long ago gone splat.
At the end of the curtain call, when all the Joan Jett and cellos have been laid to rest, there is no irony in Evan’s supposed superiority because the whole production has been slumming it. From the writer who couldn’t quite do her research, to the director who coaxed these particular performances out of these particular performers, to the actors who couldn’t bear to bare their ass cheeks or their breasts as actual strippers do every single day, to the costume designer who chose those unforgivable silver lamé wedges, to the choreographer who couldn’t divorce herself from her modern dance training—all who made Stripper Lesbians possible—seem united by their condescension for sex-workers.
We strippers, lesbian or not, deserve better than that. So do theatergoers. Do your work, thespians. It may not be sexy, but it does keep you from looking like dumbasses. And that’s one label that I’m entirely comfortable throwing around in this discourse.
You can find the full Frigid Festival schedule here; Stripper Lesbians plays intermittently until March 4, 2012. You can find Stripper Lesbians, the play, here, where you can thrill to the Stripper Lesbian theme song. Yes, really.
Because clearly someone who uses vocabulary like “Dumbasses” quantifies someone who is adept and informed in critiquing theatre? And clearly bashing an actress for NOT taking off her clothes while in the same breath saying how unflattering they look in their underwear definetely doesn’t tear down another woman? Seriously?
I believe that in the grand scheme of these things, Anonymous, “dumbasses” is a perfectly cromulent word. And if you read through the text, I believe you’ll find that I didn’t say that the actresses were not unflattering; rather, I said that their lingerie was. One thing any good stripper knows is that four square inches of Lycra can make–or break–a body. The women had perfectly lovely bodies. The clothing that the costume designer chose for their perfectly lovely bodies was just, well, fugly.
Finally, yes, I do believe that in a production about strippers that shows actual stage work, the actresses should in question be ready to strip. If the actresses in question wish not to strip in a show about strippers, they should find a show that doesn’t have stage work. Likewise, if the director, playwright, producer and so forth wish not to show strippers stripping, they should create a show with live, clothed girls.
I endeavor not to “tear down women.” But that work does not mean issuing a blank check to all art created by and featuring women. Women are just as guilty of random acts of dumbassery as men. That’s what equality is all about. The equal opportunity to succeed brightly and the equal opportunity to fail miserably. This production was, if you prefer, a definite failure.
Man, Presidents of the United States have used the word “dumbasses.” Making a big deal out of not saying “dumbasses” doesn’t make you intelligent, adept, informed, or incisive at critiquing the subtleties of the theater; what it makes you is the kind of person who’d rather needle someone about a colloquialism than present a coherent argument against the well-presented points made from experience in this review.
Incidentally, the reviewer said the lingerie was unflattering to the actors. That’s a costuming problem, not a problem with female bodies.
And “definitely” is not spelled the way you think it’s spelled.
Also, “quantifies” means “counts.” I think the word Anonymous is groping for is “qualifies.” But, really, why quibble.
Wow. That *is* a terrible theme song.
Yes. It is. And it plays before and after the production, repeatedly.
“Both strippers in question seem to have private dressing rooms.
The strippers in question know precisely what time they’ll appear on stage”
I love this. Also I only started dancing recently but I think dubstep should be outlawed. Thanks for a great read!
Aw, thanks bunches. I’m glad you enjoyed it.
I really hope the person/people behind all of this read your review. How. Embarrassing.
I’m guessing that they’re the anonymous commenters? I can’t see anyone else being invested enough to get so huffy. hilarious!
Yes, well. As I said, I do feel bad.
I remember taking this playwriting course in college, and one of the other students wrote a scene that took place in a strip club. One chick was teaching another how to work the pole in the club before it was open. And I was like, yeah, that’d never happen. Trust me, you spend as little time in that club as you can. You learn when it’s slow.
I wouldn’t write about longshoremen, welders, bankers, cardiologists, or ranch hands without educating myself about lonshoremen, welders, bankers, cardiologists or ranch hands. Why do people feel like they can write about strip clubs without doing the research? The mind boggles.
So this site censors negative feedback towards posts. Beautiful *journalism* there. I guess you were expecting a documentary?
Anonymous/name- Your comment wasn’t immediately approved because it was in the pending comments that we have to read and approve manually. If you have any questions about our commenting policy and what might prevent your comments from being approved in the future, please check here:
I lol-ed at the Joan Jett line.
Being a Lesbian, an Actress and a Sex worker I think the dumb-ass label is appropriate. My director tells me what he wants, then I spend time researching the subject. So when I go on stage I can be believable and not some cartoon.
Total fail production. They were using the premise to sell sex, not the show. If you wish to portray a stripper, on stage, and do not wish to get fully unclothed there are body suits for that, in enough colors to closely match skin tone.
This wasnt theater, it was cheap titillation posing as social commentary. Disingenuous and trite.
Wow, you just said everything I said far better than I did and succinctly. I take my dress off to you, good woman.
Is this thing still playing? It sounds a lot like “Showgirls” in which case I’d consider it a “must see”!!!!
No longer, sadly. It was part of a festival. You might check the webpage for the show to see if there are upcoming performances otherwhere.
Also, I know Showgirls, and Lesbian Strippers is no Showgirls.
Nice post Chelsea, very interesting to me… These posts and comments make me believe that we’re not a scum of society (escort ladies and strippers).
Thanks for an interesting article.