<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Racism of Decriminalization	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/</link>
	<description>By and about sex workers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sex Work &#124; Philosophy Tube - CorruptionByLawEnforcement		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1360502</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sex Work &#124; Philosophy Tube - CorruptionByLawEnforcement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1360502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] https://tinyurl.com/y6bvvtu7 Nada DeCat, “The Racism of Decriminalisation” in Tits and Sass http://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/ PION, Shadow Report to the UN/CEDAW &#8211; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="https://tinyurl.com/y6bvvtu7" rel="nofollow ugc">https://tinyurl.com/y6bvvtu7</a> Nada DeCat, “The Racism of Decriminalisation” in Tits and Sass <a href="http://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/" rel="ugc">http://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/</a> PION, Shadow Report to the UN/CEDAW &#8211; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Whore		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1339221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1339221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We linked this essay on the Archive page of our website and noted it as a &quot;must-read&quot; for all white hookers engaging in decriminalization activism. Bravo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We linked this essay on the Archive page of our website and noted it as a &#8220;must-read&#8221; for all white hookers engaging in decriminalization activism. Bravo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Capitalism Is Killing My Fellow Sex Workers		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1273345</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capitalism Is Killing My Fellow Sex Workers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1273345</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] on this issue, sex workers are still being abused by the police and murdered by clients. Meanwhile, migrant workers in the local sex industry continue to face a regime of criminalization and state [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on this issue, sex workers are still being abused by the police and murdered by clients. Meanwhile, migrant workers in the local sex industry continue to face a regime of criminalization and state [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laura Agustín		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1228673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura Agustín]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2019 15:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1228673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of the many strands of this conflictive conversation is about the term migrant, and how it does and doesn&#039;t intersect with &#039;race&#039; or ethnicity. When I began to study what I was seeing in the mid-90s the women I knew were mostly latin americans of all countries and colours. I went to Europe to observe the supposed helping they were subject to by social workers and ngo projects. For me migrant was (and still is) a status, not a permanent identity. But in the ensuing years it has been studied and named a great deal, the word over-used, more and more people calling themselves migrants. We see secure middle-class folks who cross borders to do well-paid jobs being called migrants. Within the EU it&#039;s common: a French person moves to London and stays 5 years before going to Italy, and so on. And it&#039;s not only Europe: I was recently at an international sexworker meeting in Amsterdam where the question &#039;who is a migrant?&#039; had nearly everyone replying yes. Children born to migrants who did and didn&#039;t stay and manage to become citizens are sometimes called migrants themselves. How long everyone&#039;s been abroad comes into play, and whether they went &#039;back home&#039; in the end. And there are more issues, so it becomes difficult to distinguish levels of power, access to rights and Otherness. I can think of a million more things to say but won&#039;t!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the many strands of this conflictive conversation is about the term migrant, and how it does and doesn&#8217;t intersect with &#8216;race&#8217; or ethnicity. When I began to study what I was seeing in the mid-90s the women I knew were mostly latin americans of all countries and colours. I went to Europe to observe the supposed helping they were subject to by social workers and ngo projects. For me migrant was (and still is) a status, not a permanent identity. But in the ensuing years it has been studied and named a great deal, the word over-used, more and more people calling themselves migrants. We see secure middle-class folks who cross borders to do well-paid jobs being called migrants. Within the EU it&#8217;s common: a French person moves to London and stays 5 years before going to Italy, and so on. And it&#8217;s not only Europe: I was recently at an international sexworker meeting in Amsterdam where the question &#8216;who is a migrant?&#8217; had nearly everyone replying yes. Children born to migrants who did and didn&#8217;t stay and manage to become citizens are sometimes called migrants themselves. How long everyone&#8217;s been abroad comes into play, and whether they went &#8216;back home&#8217; in the end. And there are more issues, so it becomes difficult to distinguish levels of power, access to rights and Otherness. I can think of a million more things to say but won&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nada DeCat		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1226315</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nada DeCat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1226315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1226176&quot;&gt;Anne&lt;/a&gt;.

It was clearly stated that NZPC have accepted the changes, not &#039;assert to make the change against migrants&#039;. The article was not about migrant sex work experience and realities of it in NZ, rather the effect Healy has globally when promoting NZ as having the best model in the world. This is irresponsible considering the easiest way for many activists to push legalisation (calling it &quot;decriminalisation&quot;) is by throwing migrants under the bus. As the article points out, this is also the tactic of people pushing Swedish/Nordic model. 

Further, if it were white people that were criminalised and no one else, I am sure that she will not be going around doing research to prove that it is the best model, only to then do conflicting research saying it is horrible for migrants. There is clear conflicting desire and messaging on NZ front that needs to resolved. For the most part, Healy has been promoting the model as being the best at the cost of migrants. 

This is also not a PERSONAL ATTACK on Healy. I have no personal issue with her aside from the irresponsible messaging. It seems there is a cult of Healy and I can not criticise any of her actions without outright rejection and vilification. Yes, she is throwing migrants under the bus when ever she downplays the criminalising of migrants and promoting the model as best in the world. I guess people are so blinded by awesomeness of Healy that they can not see that it is offensive and irresponsible. Further, she is the spokesperson for NZPC. If there are conflict within the NZPC and therefore, what she is saying - that is also not my problem to figure out. 

I actually have little hope for migrants in NZ. It would be very difficult to change the laws now especially when trafficking and anti-migrant sentiments is the dominant narrative. This article is less to do with NZ, but rather, how to make sure this does not happen ever again and to let other activists know the dangers and also that migrants aren&#039;t stupid - we know and are watching. We are silenced by the white sex workers&#039; movement to not say anything and eat it. I have been silent for YEARS. Enough is enough. It is easier to disseminate information to the rest of the activist community rather than try to change NZ from the outside - this is not my place nor my job and intention. Healy/NZPC seem to care little for migrant issues globally - I also care little about how she/NZPC might look or feel with my messaging globally.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1226176">Anne</a>.</p>
<p>It was clearly stated that NZPC have accepted the changes, not &#8216;assert to make the change against migrants&#8217;. The article was not about migrant sex work experience and realities of it in NZ, rather the effect Healy has globally when promoting NZ as having the best model in the world. This is irresponsible considering the easiest way for many activists to push legalisation (calling it &#8220;decriminalisation&#8221;) is by throwing migrants under the bus. As the article points out, this is also the tactic of people pushing Swedish/Nordic model. </p>
<p>Further, if it were white people that were criminalised and no one else, I am sure that she will not be going around doing research to prove that it is the best model, only to then do conflicting research saying it is horrible for migrants. There is clear conflicting desire and messaging on NZ front that needs to resolved. For the most part, Healy has been promoting the model as being the best at the cost of migrants. </p>
<p>This is also not a PERSONAL ATTACK on Healy. I have no personal issue with her aside from the irresponsible messaging. It seems there is a cult of Healy and I can not criticise any of her actions without outright rejection and vilification. Yes, she is throwing migrants under the bus when ever she downplays the criminalising of migrants and promoting the model as best in the world. I guess people are so blinded by awesomeness of Healy that they can not see that it is offensive and irresponsible. Further, she is the spokesperson for NZPC. If there are conflict within the NZPC and therefore, what she is saying &#8211; that is also not my problem to figure out. </p>
<p>I actually have little hope for migrants in NZ. It would be very difficult to change the laws now especially when trafficking and anti-migrant sentiments is the dominant narrative. This article is less to do with NZ, but rather, how to make sure this does not happen ever again and to let other activists know the dangers and also that migrants aren&#8217;t stupid &#8211; we know and are watching. We are silenced by the white sex workers&#8217; movement to not say anything and eat it. I have been silent for YEARS. Enough is enough. It is easier to disseminate information to the rest of the activist community rather than try to change NZ from the outside &#8211; this is not my place nor my job and intention. Healy/NZPC seem to care little for migrant issues globally &#8211; I also care little about how she/NZPC might look or feel with my messaging globally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anne		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1226176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1226176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with the overall thrust of this piece, but think there are some issues with the way Catherine and the NZPC were characterised in it. From what I know, Section 19 of the PRA that criminalises migrant sex work was added at the last minute by a Labour MP who wanted to &#039;combat trafficking&#039;, against advice from the NZPC, so it wasn&#039;t really the NZPC&#039;s model. The Collective has also commissioned research that among other things criticises Section 19 (Roguski, 2013) and has been trying to get the section repealed for the past few years. I&#039;m not sure if the author has ever worked in New Zealand, but if not then I think a piece by a migrant worker in NZ would have been more accurate. It&#039;s true though that the Roguski research would&#039;ve been better if done by another migrant SWer, I&#039;m not sure what efforts were made for that to happen.

That said, I think the points about how the model is talked about are legit, since it&#039;s ofc not full decrim. Also disappointed to hear of what Bennachie said at the AIDS conference; plus the SEXHUM project looks bad and it&#039;s definitely fucked up that it&#039;s largely done by white people. So yeah, despite what I think about some of the NZPC details I don&#039;t want to come across as slanging the whole article, cos it&#039;s good and migrant SWers deserve better from NZ SW activism. Also agree that it was bad form for Catherine to refer to the author as sounding like &#039;our enemies&#039;, cos jeesh the power differential is huge both btwn whorephobes and the author and btwn Catherine and the author. Appreciation to the author for raising this stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the overall thrust of this piece, but think there are some issues with the way Catherine and the NZPC were characterised in it. From what I know, Section 19 of the PRA that criminalises migrant sex work was added at the last minute by a Labour MP who wanted to &#8216;combat trafficking&#8217;, against advice from the NZPC, so it wasn&#8217;t really the NZPC&#8217;s model. The Collective has also commissioned research that among other things criticises Section 19 (Roguski, 2013) and has been trying to get the section repealed for the past few years. I&#8217;m not sure if the author has ever worked in New Zealand, but if not then I think a piece by a migrant worker in NZ would have been more accurate. It&#8217;s true though that the Roguski research would&#8217;ve been better if done by another migrant SWer, I&#8217;m not sure what efforts were made for that to happen.</p>
<p>That said, I think the points about how the model is talked about are legit, since it&#8217;s ofc not full decrim. Also disappointed to hear of what Bennachie said at the AIDS conference; plus the SEXHUM project looks bad and it&#8217;s definitely fucked up that it&#8217;s largely done by white people. So yeah, despite what I think about some of the NZPC details I don&#8217;t want to come across as slanging the whole article, cos it&#8217;s good and migrant SWers deserve better from NZ SW activism. Also agree that it was bad form for Catherine to refer to the author as sounding like &#8216;our enemies&#8217;, cos jeesh the power differential is huge both btwn whorephobes and the author and btwn Catherine and the author. Appreciation to the author for raising this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PJ Starr		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1225714</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ Starr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 04:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1225714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I found Nada’s piece and the honest commentary extremely interesting to read. I do have hope for the future seeing how bravely folks are speaking on these issues. Also would like to send a little virtual love to everyone who commented but especially to Nada as well. It costs us to write, speak about our oppressions and to make difficult choices. Thanks you and your efforts are seen and valued. Thank you also tits and sass. Your efforts also appreciated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found Nada’s piece and the honest commentary extremely interesting to read. I do have hope for the future seeing how bravely folks are speaking on these issues. Also would like to send a little virtual love to everyone who commented but especially to Nada as well. It costs us to write, speak about our oppressions and to make difficult choices. Thanks you and your efforts are seen and valued. Thank you also tits and sass. Your efforts also appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Caty Simon		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1225230</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caty Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 05:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1225230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1225095&quot;&gt;AssEater69&lt;/a&gt;.

The author explained above: &quot;People with valid working visas are still arrested and deported if they engage in sex work.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1225095">AssEater69</a>.</p>
<p>The author explained above: &#8220;People with valid working visas are still arrested and deported if they engage in sex work.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elena Jeffreys		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1225199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elena Jeffreys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 23:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1225199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a marginalised group I believe that those of us who are white within the sex worker movement need to stop being apologists for shitty legislation, racism, border-mania and the hyper-policing of certain groups of people within the sex worker community. Not ok. Even (&#038; especially) within juristdictions that grant other sex workers protections.

White sex workers within the movement need to take responsiblity for unpacking our own privilege. Thank you Nada for calling this out, and also it sucks that it takes sex workers of colour and sex workers of migrant backgrounds to literally go out on a limb in order for the movement to take this up as a serious question. Lets not shoot the messenger.

Neither NSW or New Zealand have full decriminalisation. Doesn&#039;t matter how much we &#062;wish&#060; it were different, or have campaigned for it to be different, we CAN NO LONGER dress up either set of laws as ideal. To do so is racist. I own that I have done this for years too.... and I want my future advocacy to be less racist.

Lets own the racism inherent in social movements, society, and yes, within our very own community. To overlook this is to deny the deep roots of settler-colonialism, genocide of indigenous peoples, white supremacy.... et al. NO MORE DENIAL.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a marginalised group I believe that those of us who are white within the sex worker movement need to stop being apologists for shitty legislation, racism, border-mania and the hyper-policing of certain groups of people within the sex worker community. Not ok. Even (&amp; especially) within juristdictions that grant other sex workers protections.</p>
<p>White sex workers within the movement need to take responsiblity for unpacking our own privilege. Thank you Nada for calling this out, and also it sucks that it takes sex workers of colour and sex workers of migrant backgrounds to literally go out on a limb in order for the movement to take this up as a serious question. Lets not shoot the messenger.</p>
<p>Neither NSW or New Zealand have full decriminalisation. Doesn&#8217;t matter how much we &gt;wish&lt; it were different, or have campaigned for it to be different, we CAN NO LONGER dress up either set of laws as ideal. To do so is racist. I own that I have done this for years too&#8230;. and I want my future advocacy to be less racist.</p>
<p>Lets own the racism inherent in social movements, society, and yes, within our very own community. To overlook this is to deny the deep roots of settler-colonialism, genocide of indigenous peoples, white supremacy&#8230;. et al. NO MORE DENIAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AssEater69		</title>
		<link>https://titsandsass.com/the-racism-of-decriminalization/#comment-1225095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AssEater69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://titsandsass.com/?p=24697#comment-1225095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What do you mean by migrant workers still being criminalised? Because they&#039;re working without visas? This is something that applies to all work, not just sex work. Working without a visa is illegal in every country? So why on earth would a government randomly allow sex workers without visas to work when every other industry it would be illegal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by migrant workers still being criminalised? Because they&#8217;re working without visas? This is something that applies to all work, not just sex work. Working without a visa is illegal in every country? So why on earth would a government randomly allow sex workers without visas to work when every other industry it would be illegal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
