Like lots of small businesses these days, San Francisco’s unionized, worker-owned peepshow has hit some seriously tough financial times. But they’re still fighting to stay open! You can support their efforts here.
Some background: The Lusties unionized in 1997 and became a co-op in 2003 and, in addition to being the only unionized peepshow co-op in the world, they also remain one of San Francisco’s only independent clubs. Instead of paying stage fees and hustling for private dances, they receive hourly wages and each own a share of the business. Which sounds great in theory, but seems to not have been working so well in recent years.
Just days after celebrating their 15th anniversary of unionization, rumors hit the web that the club could be shutting down soon, due to worker disagreements, competition from internet porn, their idealistic-but-possibly-impractical business model (it can’t be easy getting a strip club to function as a co-op, when dancers tend to be transient side), and the general state of the economy.
Quite a few of the co-op members have left (Jolene Parton and Sandy Bottoms tell their stories here), but some are still working hard to stay open, according to this article from the SF Chronicle which, I’ll warn you, is pretty judgy and offensive. How come in such a famously sex-positive city, the biggest newspaper can’t find someone to write about the Lusty Lady’s current situation without throwing in a little anti-stripper moralization?
I’ll resist the urge to dissect the Chronicle piece and all the ways it fails (it’s pretty obvious if you read it) and encourage everyone one more time to support the Lusty Lady.
a lot of women’s studies majors will be out of a job, but at least they can claim that they were “sex workers” for a while.
Gee, thanks for invalidating countless womens’ entry to and experience of the sex industry, Andi. Dancing in a peepshow is sex work, just like webcamming, porn, stripping, escorting, sensual massage, pro-domming, fetish work, and many other iterations.
When I was a manager at the Lusty, in 2010-11, we actively screened auditioners for signs of women’s studies majors wanting to dabble, because frankly, those girls are unreliable and annoying to work with, and have NO idea how to walk in heels.
Andi, did you just want to see your name on the screen so badly that you typed the first thing that sprung to mind? Your comment doesn’t even make sense, how do you know anything about any of these women? Blanket statements rule, apparently. Also, what’s with the quotation marks? As if what these women do isn’t legitimate sex work?
Jolene, girl, you got it right. Also, this happy sex worker isn’t a women’s studies major.
Also,
I donated. Go team.
I am also far from being a womens studies major and still found sex work money helpful to my life. I hope the lusty gets saved!
Carmen