In 2 hours he could hardly hold a conversation with the people he invited over and comes across as a rather dull and boring individual. it rather makes me doubt the sincerity of the piece itself being anything beyond simply “hey this sounds like it could be a clever idea, its so meta” and not really a work of art with any actual thought put into its intended meaning whatsoever.

We’re treated to 2 hours of top40 radio songs and insipid childish questions about clients with the first person and sudden “whoah dude i aint gay but im totally ok with dudes” type attitude in the second.

you’d think an actual artist attempting to create an actual work of art that could exist outside of their own childish narcissism would engage the two people he’s invited over, considering he’s filming it (obviously ignoring the consent part of that for a moment), in a conversation about their feelings – dialogue with them about his supposes “thesis”, maybe even begin to understand the question he may have momentaarily asked himself that was the inception of the piece but oh so quickly forgot to even come back to through its creation.

You’d think someone who actually makes art is expressing something, or saying something, not simply coming up w/ the clever copywrite and hoping everyone just buys it based upon the title because its rather devoid of anything. Or do we not get something like that because the artist wasnt being paid enough for their art? I thought it was the sort of thing artists just did, as if it were an unavoidable destination of fate?