I mainly agree with what your saying. The part that isnt mentioned is where these delusions come from. Just watch a Dr Phil episode, or some Sugar Daddy special on NBC. The media has glamorized the Sugar World by making the 2% rare cases of lucrative wealth, stand out as the stereotype. Basically there is this super wealthy older gentleman dishing out cars and condos to pretty college gals. And although it definitely exists and I have been in one of those 2% relationships more than once, it is not the majority.

Hey Todd

Thanks so much for your insight. That is the one thing us girls overlook, is the other sides perspective. I learned the hard way in the Sugar world, and I ended up deciding that escorting is a better flow from week to week. The girls that usually accept 200 per meet. Are very naive, very in need of money and also dont realize that a mere hour as an escort would get them 200 bucks. I remember the days when someone would pay me 350 and I’d literally sit with them for half the day. Now I know that they were ex hobbyist looking for a beautiful, educated lady unfamiliar with the other side of the tracks for a cheaper price. I wish it hadnt taken so many years to figure out, but at least now I use SA for what it really is designed for. The older, very wealthy SD. I will do per date situations, but not for a dime less than 1000 per meet. And even if I spend a few hours, I still calculate it as an escort in my head and make sure I am never going below 250 per hour.

Myself, I started with massages, then escorts, then SA/Sugardaddy.com. SA yielded the highest quality of person, IMHO. Just as Todd stated, there were many women who had their own net worth, and were seeking alternative relationships. Either outside their own dead marriage, relationship or what I call ‘Alpha Woman’- Women who had very high net worths, but clearly a darker side/approach to dating; whom also sought out similar “Alpha Males”.

Men who use SA, generally fail at escorting is probably among the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard. It’s actually the complete opposite. Myself and 3 of my closest friends who have high annual incomes, would be described as ‘Playboys’. We work hard, and play, harder. No pun intended.

Sure arm candy is nice, but nicer when when her 19-25 y/o ass is naked walking around the pool.

We pay for what we want, when we want, and the convenience. Sure, there have been a few girls where real friendships were born; the reality is that I’d say there’s guilt on both sides in the naive department.

Bluntness, honesty and straight forwardness is the key to success with these relationships.

I stumble across this blog, and found this interesting. I find SA interesting, yet weird. This type of arrangement is interesting and could work, but I find the women on the site to be, well; Delusional. As you noted:

SA attracts a lot of very young women who believe that they are going to meet dashing 29-year-old millionaires on the site. The reality is that most of the real SDs are over 35–with 40- or 50-something being more typical. (I’m 45, BTW. I am no Brad Pitt; but I’m clean, reasonably good-looking, and height-weight proportionate).

A lot of the younger women on the site were looking for “a young, hot sugar daddy”. To me, this seems unrealistic. I asked a few of them: “If you just want to date young guys, why not just head to the campus bar or sign up for Zoosk? SA is a sugar daddy site.”

Then there were women who stated at the outset, “no sex”. I’m a gentleman, but I’m not interested in paying $200 to $300 to take a woman out to dinner. The idea of “arm candy” is mostly invented by women, I think. Few men really think that way. I never even bothered emailing most of these women.

Finally, there were a number of women between 28 and 40 who saw SA as a sort of high-end Match.com. Most of these women seemed to have decent incomes of their own, and they were looking to meet a doctor or attorney who would be “Mr. Right.”

There is nothing wrong with this desire, mind you; but that’s not the agenda of SA.

I agree with this. Women seem to not understand the pool of very wealthy (and by this, I mean guys who have true net worth of at least $10 million and up) men is very slim. And while wealth is getting younger thanks to tech, the youthful wealth of Mark Zuckerbergs are a very rare breed. I notice women have ridiculous demands and standards on here…ladies, being pretty is not an exclusive trait. You’re not in the driver’s seat in this world. And once you hit 30, your “Value” starts to drop when your in a open and competitive platform like SA. You want $10,000+/month allowance? Really? Just because you think you’re pretty? Honey, look around, you’re surrounded by equal age and younger women who are just as interesting-if not more-as you. I hate to equate this to economics, but the demand is WAY higher than the value of the supply in this market.

Hanna, you might actually read the above article before giving your opinions (which are mostly based on wishful thinking, I suspect). Avery Day is basically saying what I’m saying, albeit from the female perspective.

People don’t just hand other people significant amounts of money for nothing. The real world doesn’t work that way. No man is going to “pay a monthly allowance” and “support someone financially” in a situation where “sex is optional”.

Yes, some SB/SD relationships do develop into longtime, ongoing arrangements. However, there are very few men out there who are going to commit to “supporting” anyone from the get-go.

Most arrangements start out on a per-meeting basis. In my area (the Midwest), there are plenty of women on the arrangement sites who will agree to $200 to $300 per meeting (with intimacy included).

There are, however, (as I detailed above) many ladies who enter the site with unrealistic expectations. They inevitably end up dropping off after a few weeks.

But don’t take my word for it. Read the above article.

So…basically you ARE looking for an escort, but you simply don’t want to call her an escort… Riiiiiiiiiight. #smh

If you would offer me 300$ per meet and would only want to fuck me and nothing else, then I’d consider that an insult, and most SBs I know would agree with me. It is common practise to pay a monthly allowance to SBs and to support them financially, it excited a wealthy man to spoil a girl and to get her time and attention in return. Sex is almost always optional in these relationships, not what we SBs get paid for predominantly. You, a gentleman? Don’t make me laugh!