Loollllll thanks for the tip, though somehow that seems even more appropriate.

Guys “ethics” definitely never impressed me. I honestly think Larry Flint was the more honest one, since he doesn’t “tame” the sex in his mags, didn’t decide to gut it of pictures, never photoshopped the images to conform to the “right look”, or a dozen other idiot things. Oh, and, as far as I know, he never published/publishes opinion pieces from people whose politics are right wing, or ignorant twits like McCarthy, just because they look good nude, and probably insisted they be allowed to publish a ignorant screed about vaccine dangers (or what ever absurd nonsense the “model” in question believed in), to allow their pictures included in the magazine. That combination of nonsense made me stop “reading” his magazine well before he decided to turn it into an empty shell, which existed only for “articles” filled with such pointless nonsense.

I mean, who was he trying to fool about the point of the magazine, other than himself? And, how is throwing out the original content, in favor of just the useless nonsense in the articles, which where no better than what you often get in the National Equirer sometimes, “redeeming”, or what ever removing the pics was supposed to accomplish?